EDUCATION
Saturday, May 4, 2002
8:30am-11:30am
Workshops
4000
Giving Bad News: How Do We Teach It?
The ability to share bad news
effectively is an essential skill for pediatricians. The
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education has
recently endorsed six competencies for resident
education, one of which involves the development of
interpersonal and communication skills. Bad news spans a
variety of circumstances, from discussing an abnormal
laboratory test, a physical examination finding with
uncertain prognosis, the disclosure of a
life-threatening diagnosis or a child's death. During
this interactive skills-based workshop, participants
will identify important components of giving bad news by
review of videotapes. The perspectives and reactions of
parents, patients, and health care professionals in
receiving and giving bad news will be explored. Useful
techniques will be identified and practiced during
role-plays with participants and standardized patients.
Participants will develop ideas of implementation of
teaching techniques and evaluation of this competency
for their own institutions.
J. R. Serwint, The Johns Hopkins Children’s Center,
Baltimore, MD, L. Greenberg, Internal Consultant,
Faculty Development, George Washington University School
of Medicine, Washington, DC and B. S. Siegel, Boston
University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center,
Boston, MA
4001
Pediatricians Summoning Action for Children
Pediatricians have
traditionally been natural and effective advocates for
children and youth. Increasingly, pediatricians find
themselves in advocacy roles, such as helping families
navigate managed care systems, persuading administrators
to increase funding for pediatric health care and
research, or advising community programs on how best to
meet the needs of youth. However, there is a lack of
consensus on what is (and is not) advocacy, and how
pediatricians can be effective advocates for their
patients, families, and communities. This workshop is
designed to create a forum to discuss these issues.
Advocacy will be defined in the context of pediatric and
community health. A framework for "the doing"
of advocacy will be examined through case examples of
advocacy projects designed and carried out by residents
from six pediatric programs funded by The Anne E. Dyson
Community Pediatrics Training Initiative. Sample
projects will include advocacy at the individual, local
community, and state and national government levels, and
will focus on projects that take an idea and create a
plan of action after a thorough assessment of the
perceived problem and the target community. These cases
highlight the importance of community partnership and
evaluation. Through this process, participants will gain
a broadened understanding of the pediatrician’s role
as advocate and skills that serve this role.
J. Pletcher, A. Amzel, S. Cohen, C. Derauf, J. Goepp,
P. Hametz, K. Hendricks, W. Kessel, F. LeFlore, D.
Schwarz, J. Skelton, H. Taras, and K. Zieselman, The
Anne E. Dyson Community Pediatrics Training Initiative
Advocacy Group
4002
The Brief Structured Observation : A Tool for Focused
Feedback
The Brief Structured
Observation (BSO) method can be an effective way to
observe, assess and help learners. It allows for
structured observation and specific feedback in
inpatient and outpatient settings. It is efficient, fast
and patient friendly. The technique applies principles
of adult learning, since we collect information that is
learner-centered and provide immediate, specific
feedback to the learner.
In the ‘BSO,’ a faculty member or senior resident
watches a trainee (student or intern) perform a short
segment of a patient encounter. During this encounter
the preceptor writes verbatim the questions or
statements of the student. Following the segment the
preceptor debriefs the learner and uses the recorded
script to provide specific feedback on the encounter.
In an interactive format, workshop participants will
practice the technique by observing live medical
students and simulated patients. We will also model the
BSO method by giving participants feedback on their
skills. We will also discuss our experience using the
BSO in different settings (inpatient and outpatient) and
at different institutions. This educational program won
the American Academy of Pediatrics Educational Project
Award for 2000.
K. Pituch, J. Fliegel, K. Layton, T. Murphy,
University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, S.
Miller, Columbia University College of Physicians and
Surgeons, New York NY, M. Gusic, Penn State University
College of Medicine, M. Harris, Indiana University
8:30am-11:30am
Special Interest Groups
4005
Directors of Divisions of General Pediatrics
The Directors of Divisions of
General Pediatrics SIG will present the "Ideal
Academic Out-Patient Office." We will start with a
1-hour presentation of "Same Day Scheduling"
by Bernard P. Dreyer and follow with "Teaching
residents while being economically efficient" whose
presenter is under discussion. We will also have a
45-minute open forum on common problems interfering with
effective teaching and economic success.
Cochairs: Gary A. Emmett, Gemmett@nemours.org,
and John N. Walburn, jwalburn@unmc.edu
4007
Newborn Nursery
The newborn nursery SIG will
discuss Group B Streptococcus prevention and evaluation
for newborn sepsis with the goal of developing a
multicentered study of asymptomatic babies at risk.
Current practice and protocols for the SIG study will be
discussed and a plan established to answer the
questions. Teaching our students and residents in the
nursery a competency based curriculum presents a
challenge. Each participant will bring their program’s
needs, challenges and curriculum to discuss in small
groups for "hands- on" experience in
critiquing the existing curricula, developing a model
curriculum and generating creative ideas for
implementation. An update on screening for
hyperbilirubinemia and treatment will be discussed in
light of the JACO Kernicterus alert. Other topics will
include circumcision, breastfeeding solutions and pain
management.
Chair: Linda Meloy, Lmeloy@hsc.vcu.edu
Supported by an educational grant from Natus Medical
Inc.
10:00am-12:00pm
Educational Seminar
ES01
Applying for NIH Research Grants
In the current climate of
funding opportunities, the ability to successfully
obtain extramural support involves applying for grants
that are appropriate for an investigator's career stage
and drafting a clear and focused application. In this
session, we will discuss career-stage-appropriate
funding opportunities from the NIH. We will also address
how to write a grant application, focusing on strategies
with proven success. The working of NIH study sections
will be reviewed along with how to best address the
concerns of review panels. We will also focus on how to
obtain funding for fellowship postdoctoral training and
early stages of an academic career.
Pedro A. Jose, Georgetown University Medical Center,
Washington, DC; Anshumali Chaudhari, Center for
Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health,
Bethesda, MD; and Terry Rogers Bishop, DKUHD, NIDDK, NIH,
Bethesda, MD
10:00am-12:00pm
Educational Seminar
ES03
Career Paths for Clinician-Educators: Planning and
Moving Ahead in Your Career as a Clinician-Educator
Clinician educators are those
physicians whose career activities combine patient care
and the teaching and supervision of medical students and
residents, and whose scholarly activities promote
excellence in medical education.
With this workshop, it is expected that participants
will:
- have a better understanding of the motivations,
career plans and works responsibilities of
clinician-educators and will be able to compare the
motives for their careers with those of other
clinician-educators.
- learn how a mentoring program can help the
clinician-educator plan and develop his/her career.
- have a better understanding of specific faculty
development activities (workshops, microteaching,
teaching evaluations, teaching consultations) and
the evidence for the effectiveness of these
activities.
- have a better understanding of the evaluation of
teachers, and how these evaluations are used for
faculty development, promotion and compensation, and
will learn guidelines for developing an effective
Teaching Dossier, which can be the key to successful
promotion.
Robert I. Hilliard, Department of Pediatrics,
Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto,
Toronto, ON, Canada; Karen Leslie, Division of
Adolescent Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children,
University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; and Ann
Jefferies, Division of Neonatology, Mount Sinai
Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
10:00am-12:00pm
Educational Seminar
ES04
Effective, Efficient and Innovative Medical Student and
Resident Teaching: Who Says It Can't Be Done?
With increased pressures to
treat patients as efficiently as possible, teaching of
medical students and residents has become more of a
burden or even an afterthought and less of a major
priority in the clinical setting. Effective, efficient,
and innovative teaching strategies are needed. This
seminar will provide participants with such strategies
that will in turn aid in the recruitment, faculty
development, and retention of preceptors. Mock teaching
codes, videotapes, and other live demonstrations will be
used to highlight the techniques and innovations to be
introduced. Content areas will focus on the importance
of a good orientation, feedback, evaluation, and
creative teaching techniques that will make teaching fun
and a true learning experience for all involved.
Lewis R. First, Department of Pediatrics, University
of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT
10:00am-12:00pm
Educational Seminar
ES05
Managing the Business of Academic Pediatrics
Career and program development
in Pediatric Departments is increasingly tied to the
generation of resources that support these efforts as
well as cost-containment efforts. This seminar will
address the application of business principles and
approaches that should be useful to current directors of
programs, or those who aspire to be directors, as they
plan and manage these programs. Concepts to be
introduced in a case discussion format include cost
analyses, longitudinal budgeting, mission-based
budgeting, business plan development and productivity
analysis and enhancement.
Thomas F. Boat, Children's Hospital Medical Center,
Cincinnati, OH; Michael K. Farrell, Children's Hospital
Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH; and Lori Mackey,
Research Administration, Children's Hospital Research
Foundation, Cincinnati, OH
10:00am-12:00pm
Educational Seminar
ES06
Minority Faculty Career Development
The seminar leaders will
review the probable career paths of clinical and basic
research faculty. The session will begin with a detailed
description of important considerations for young
faculty when choosing their first position after
residency/fellowship. The various promotion tracks and
sampling of a number of institutions around the country
will provide concrete examples. Time management, special
funding opportunities for minority faculty, innovative
funding sources, mentoring and career development will
be featured. Local and national support networks for a
faculty will be discussed. The integration of the issues
of race and medicine will be highlighted.
Danielle Laraque, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New
York, NY; and Phyllis A. Dennery, Stanford University
School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA
10:00am-12:00pm
Educational Seminar
ES07
Nontraditional Approaches to Academic Success
The goals of this workshop
will be to develop effective techniques to
"balance" our lives. Participants will define
individual success and set personal goals and develop
innovative techniques to achieve them. Through round
table and small group discussions, individual exercises
and role-plays, participants will explore successful
approaches to working with a reduced FTE
("part-time"), developing an educator’s
portfolio, tackling the promotion and tenure process,
and negotiating with supervisors. Breakout session on
individual topics will allow participants ample time to
share experiences and to problem solve. Participants
will receive relevant handout materials including
information from a literature review. Creative ways to
achieve success and maintain balance in life will be
presented, discussed and practiced.
Sharon Dabrow, University of South Florida, Tampa,
FL; and Maryellen E. Gusic, Penn State Children's
Hospital, Hershey, PA
10:00am-12:00pm
Educational Seminar
ES08
Recognizing Common Biostatistical Errors: A Case-Based
Approach
Back by popular demand, this
seminar uses multiple real examples from the pediatric
literature to teach participants how to be more
discriminating consumers of statistics. Topics to be
covered include standard deviation vs. standard error of
the mean, commonly violated assumptions of statistical
tests, including normality and independent sampling,
between- vs. within-groups comparisons, "type
3" (dumb or careless) errors, odds ratios versus
risk ratios, relative versus absolute effect sizes, and
multiple comparisons. In the last part of the seminar,
participants will have the opportunity to test what they’ve
learned on a set of "unknown" examples.
Yvonne Wu, University of California, San Francisco,
CA; and Thomas B. Newman, University of California, San
Francisco, CA
10:00am-12:00pm
Educational Seminar
ES09
Survival Skills for Pediatric Fellows
This seminar is intended to
help pediatric fellows and young junior faculty with
challenges they face at each stage of their training
including: how to identify worthwhile research projects,
how to apportion time between research and course work,
how to choose and work with a mentor, how to complete
projects during one's fellowship, when and how to write
grants, how to get and negotiate a job, how to balance
career and family, and how to transition to life as a
junior faculty member. This workshop will be of
particular interest to current pediatric fellows of any
year, but it will also provide useful insights for those
who recently completed or are considering a fellowship.
The facilitators will include faculty at all stages of
their career and will include both clinician scientists
and clinician educators. There will be ample time for
open discussion and question and answer.
Dimitri A. Christakis, University of Washington,
Seattle, WA; and Paula Lozano, University of Washington,
Seattle, WA
10:00am-12:00pm
Educational Seminar
ES10
The Art and Science of Negotiating for a Faculty
Position: A Practical Guide for Fellows and Junior
Faculty
The process of interviewing
and negotiating for a faculty position is a common
experience of most fellows, and many residents and
junior faculty. There is little, if any, training in
this process. This seminar will 1) identify key concepts
of the interviewing and negotiation process, 2) increase
the awareness of residents, fellows and junior faculty
of these concepts when applying for positions in
academic medicine, and 3) develop skills in utilizing
them. These concepts include preparation for, and
elements of, the first and subsequent interviews, stages
and styles of the negotiation process, and core issues
such as compensation, office space, research resources,
promotion guidelines and family considerations. Brief
didactic presentations and case-directed discussions
will highlight these concepts. Participants will have
the opportunity to apply concepts learned to simulated
interview situations.
Thomas G. DeWitt, Division of General and Community
Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Medical Center,
Cincinnati, OH; Claibourne I. Dungy, Division of General
Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University of
Iowa, Iowa City, IA; and Kathleen G. Nelson, University
of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL
10:00am-12:00pm
Educational Seminar
ES11
The Mentor/Mentee Relationship: Perspectives from Both
Sides
Through this interactive
session, the participants will 1) identify the factors
that influence the mentor/mentee relationship and
strategies to aid the junior faculty member in choosing
a mentor, and 2) identify the needs of junior faculty in
launching an academic career and the potential
strategies of a mentor in meeting these needs. The
workshop leaders, Dr. Carraccio and Dr. Englander, who
function in a mentor/mentee relationship in their own
academic careers will add their perspectives regarding
these roles to the group discussion. Our hope is that
participants will leave with an understanding of how to
create and foster the mentor/mentee relationship.
Carol Carraccio, University of Maryland, Baltimore,
MD; and Robert Englander, University of Maryland,
Baltimore, MD
10:00am-12:00pm
Educational Seminar
ES12
The Promises and Pitfalls of Multi-site Collaborative
Research
This session will provide
participants with the necessary background for
developing and conducting successful multi-site
collaborative research projects in inpatient and
outpatient settings. The co-leaders, who have overseen
numerous diverse multi-site observational studies and
clinical trials, will begin the session with a focused
presentation outlining the rationale for multi-site
collaborations, the principles of successful
collaboration, and the potential pitfalls of this type
of research, answering questions about these issues.
Subsequently, they will lead the participants in a
step-by-step exercise of planning, developing and
implementing one inpatient and one outpatient study
suggested by the audience.
Richard C. (Mort) Wasserman, University of Vermont
College of Medicine, Burlington, VT; and Roger F. Soll,
University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington,
VT
12:00pm-3:00pm
Mini Course
4105
Update on Injury Control
Chair: Gary A. Smith,
Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH
The field of injury control
continues to evolve. Over the past decade new sources of
injuries have arisen, new information on old or
overlooked causes has been obtained, and new techniques
for preventing and minimizing the impact of certain
injuries have been developed and evaluated. This session
will review these advances and outline pertinent next
steps for health policy, research and clinical care.
Overview
Gary A. Smith, Columbus Children's Hospital,
Columbus, OH
Firearm Injuries: Just the Facts
M. Denise Dowd, Children's Mercy Hospital,
University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO
Update on Product-Related Injuries
Gary A. Smith, Columbus Children's Hospital,
Columbus, OH
Break
Prevention of Motor Vehicle-Related Injuries
Phyllis F. Agran, Pediatric Injury Prevention
Research Group, Health Policy and Research, University
of California, Irvine, CA
Current Federal Agency Priorities in Childhood Injury
Prevention Research
Richard A. Schieber, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, Atlanta, GA
12:00pm-3:00pm
Workshops
4106
Developing and Documenting Scholarship for Junior
Clinician-Educators
Academic medical centers have
hired an increasing number of clinician-educators to
deliver clinical care and teach. Although these
physicians contribute greatly to the mission of the
institution, many clinician-educators have difficulty
advancing in academic rank because of inadequate
scholarly activity. In this workshop,
clinician-educators will learn an expanded definition of
scholarship and strategies for increasing scholarly
productivity within the constraints of their current
position.
After a literature review on the expanded definition
of scholarship and on promotion criteria for
clinician-educators, in facilitated small groups the
participants will define clinical, educational, and
administrative duties that are part of their current
positions. A panel presentation will continue with
information about strategies and resources for
individual faculty development and methodologies for
documentation of activities (professional activity
dossiers and educational portfolios). In facilitated
small groups, case studies of typical
clinician-educators will be discussed with development
of strategies for academic success. Each participant
will then develop a strategy to convert one work duty
element into scholarly work. In a summary session,
examples will be shared. Participants will receive
detailed session notes and a bibliography.
D. Newton, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina
University, Greenville, NC, M. Grayson, New York Medical
College, Valhalla, NY, and W. Anderson, Michigan State
University, East Lansing, MI
4107
Promoting Humanism in Medicine
The new Dean of the medical
school agrees with a recent newspaper editorial that
today’s doctors are scientifically competent but seem
to lack compassion. He is committed to what his great
grandfather, Francis Peabody, said over 70 years ago,
"One of the essential qualities of a clinician is
interest in humanity, for the secret of good patient
care lies in caring for the patient." The Dean
wants medical students to become more caring,
compassionate, empathic, respectful and humanistic not
just to patients and families, but to staff, faculty and
each other as well.
This interactive workshop will explore specific ways
to promote humanism in medicine by addressing the
mandate of the new Dean. Humanism will be operationally
defined through brainstorming guided by definitions of
humanism from a variety of different sources. Analysis
of videotape vignettes and paper cases will reveal ways
to promote humanism on an individual level through
educational programs and on a departmental level. An
action plan will be developed by each workshop
participant to promote humanism in his/her own setting.
S. Z. Miller, R. T. Sarkin and F. B. Stapleton,
Departments of Pediatrics, Columbia University College
of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY, State
University of New York at Buffalo School of Medicine and
Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY, and University of
Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
4108
Truth or Consequences: Identifying and Remediating the
Problem Teacher
Most faculty in academic
health centers are hired because of their clinical or
research prowess. Yet, these physicians, many with
little training, are expected to spend a considerable
portion of their time teaching medical students. Little
time has been devoted to identifying and providing
feedback to physicians who are not good teachers, the
"problem-teachers." Identifying and either
rewarding or remediating those teachers with excellent
or deficient skills is imperative. This workshop will
explore the scope of the problem, different faculty
evaluation tools, types of "problem teachers",
and appropriate reward and remediation systems. Trigger
tapes, currently used evaluation tools and role play
will be used to identify issues such as the strengths
and weaknesses of faculty evaluation tools and reward
systems and promote interactive discussion. Participants
will break into teams to design and test evaluation
tools during the workshop. By the conclusion of the
workshop, the participant should be able to design
appropriate faculty evaluation tools, identify teaching
deficiencies, provide effective feedback to faculty
members, and design systems to improve faculty
performance.
W. Raszka and L. First, Department of Pediatrics,
University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington,
VT
12:00pm-3:00pm
Special Interest Group
4109
Advocacy Training
Resident CATCH Grants at a
Tool for Teaching Advocacy: The AAP CATCH (Community
Access to Child Health) program offers small planning
grants to residents to develop collaborative projects in
their communities. CATCH personnel will discuss the
CATCH planning grant process and discuss ways in which
the process can be used to teach community advocacy
skills.
Resident Advocacy Poster Session: We will solicit
abstracts from Residency programs, including recipients
of past Resident CATCH Planning Grants. We will select
up to12 abstracts for poster presentation at the SIG.
Core Competencies: We will solicit input from the SIG
into the formulation of guidelines for advocacy training
in residency training.
Cochairs: David Keller, KellerD@ummhc.org,
and Rosland Vaz, rvaz@lifespan.org
1:00pm-3:00pm
Platform Session
4180
Education: Residents
Chairs: Miriam Bar-on and
Daniel Rauch
1:00pm-3:00pm
Educational Seminar
ES13
Women in Academic Medicine: Balancing Strategies
This seminar will focus on the
unique issues related to the challenges of women in
academic medicine. The first topic will be the various
tracks within the academic community, and the
expectations related to promotion within these tracks.
The second topic to be discussed will be maintaining a
balance between professional and personal life, and the
presentation will include a discussion of the pros and
cons, and ups and downs of part-time employment. The
last issue to be discussed will be negotiation skills
for women in academia. Problematic scenarios will be
presented and strategies for solutions will be proposed.
Phyllis A. Dennery, Stanford University School of
Medicine, Palo Alto, CA; and Ann R. Stark
1:00pm-3:00pm
Educational Seminar
ES14
A Researcher's Approach to Funding Problems in Academic
Medical Centers
We shall review present issues
concerning the availability of research funds to
institutions and the strategies that pediatric
institutions might adopt to enhance an extramural
research funding stream. Thoughts as to how pediatric
institutions develop intramural resources will also be
presented.
We shall also present suggestions concerning the
structure and funding of pediatric institutions to
oversee, administer, and support intramural and
extramural funding for the researcher. Strategies as to
how a researcher can assist in the development and
administration of institutional research support and
utilize these resources will also be presented.
Edward S. Ogata, Children's Memorial Hospital and
Associate Dean, Northwestern University Medical School,
Chicago, IL
1:00pm-3:00pm
Educational Seminar
ES15
Abstract Preparation and Presentation
The core of the academic
meeting is the dissemination of new information through
abstracts. This session will provide the young
investigator with an approach to the preparation and
presentation of abstracts. Innovative science requires
crafting an innovative abstract to ensure program
selection. Points concerning abstract presentation to
enhance acceptance and the dos and don'ts of platform
and poster presentations will be presented in depth.
Rebecca A. Simmons, University of Pennsylvania,
Children's Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; and William W.
Fox, University of Pennsylvania, Children's Hospital of
Philadelphia, Philadelphia PA
1:00pm-3:00pm
Educational Seminar
ES16
Career Paths in Academic Medicine: Clinical/Residents
This session will delineate
the patterns of academic clinical practice. Co-led by a
general pediatrician and pediatric subspecialist, the
session will address the following topics.
- How do I decide if I want to pursue a career in
academic medicine or in community practice?
- Are there models of practice that allow me to
combine academic medicine and community practice?
- How do I decide if I want to become a general
pediatrician or want to subspecialize?
- What are the requirements for a career in general
academic pediatrics? What for subspecialists?
- How and when do I apply for fellowships?
- Who in my institution can help me with these
career decisions?
Judith S. Palfrey, Division of General Pediatrics,
Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA; and Laurie Cohen,
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
1:00pm-3:00pm
Educational Seminar
ES17
Design and Execution of Randomized Clinical Trials
Randomized controlled trials
are the gold standard for determining which treatments
are superior. More and more, clinicians of all
specialties are demanding that randomized trials show
new treatments, such as surfactant and ECMO, to be
superior to current therapy (or no therapy) before the
new treatments are adopted.
This workshop will cover principles of clinical
trials including defining the question, assessing
outcomes, defining the study and control treatments,
single- versus multi-center trials, reasons for and
methods of randomization, eligibility and exclusions,
blinding, analysis strategies, and early stopping. The
format will be didactic with extensive open discussion.
Real world examples of "what can happen if you
don't watch out" will be utilized. Participants are
encouraged, although not required, to bring an idea for
a possible clinical trial. We will use these ideas as
examples during the discussion. Statistical knowledge is
definitely not required.
Mark A. Klebanoff, NICHD, NIH, Bethesda, MD
1:00pm-3:00pm
Educational Seminar
ES18
Effective Scientific Presentation
Presenting scientific
information clearly is an essential part of a successful
scientific career. Colleagues will infer your scientific
ability from the clarity and quality of your oral
presentations. Presentation skills can be learned and
improved. In this seminar, we will discuss the following
topics:
- Organizing your presentation
- Choosing audio-visual aids
- Making effective slides
- Presenting data
- Handling questions
- Practical hints
Thomas A. Hazinski, Vanderbilt University Medical
Center, Nashville, TN
1:00pm-3:00pm
Educational Seminar
ES19
How To Be Successful in Academic Medicine: From the
Interview to Promotion
In this interactive session, a
junior faculty member along with her chairman will
facilitate an active dialog from what core questions
should be asked during the interview to how to maximize
your chances for promotion. Many issues will be directly
addressed, including: interviewing questions to ask and
answers to have at the ready, salary negotiations,
percent effort distribution, departmental commitment and
support, faculty development programs, and
identification of mentors.
Jon S. Abramson, Wake Forest University School of
Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC; and Shari Barkin, Wake
Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
1:00pm-3:00pm
Educational Seminar
ES20
Manuscript Preparation and the Process of Peer-Reviewed
Publication
This workshop will address
multiple aspects of publication in scientific journals.
Presenters will discuss preparation of materials,
including the initial decision that the data are
sufficient to justify publication. Issues related to
manuscript writing will include length, focus, adherence
to journal formats, and referencing. The editorial
process, from submission to publication will be
described in depth, with particular attention to ways in
which authors can interact with journal editors. Another
section of the workshop will cover ethical issues in
publication including review boards, authorship,
duplicate publication, intellectual property rights, and
conflict of interest. There will be open discussion of
sample cases and questions derived form the experiences
of the participants.
William F. Balistreri, Children's Hospital Medical
Center, Cincinnati, OH; Thomas R. Welch, SUNY Upstate
Medical University, Syracuse, NY; and Stephen R.
Daniels, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati,
OH
1:00pm-3:00pm
Educational Seminar
ES21
Manuscript Preparation
The aims of this session are
to discuss 1) preparation of a scientific manuscript for
submission; 2) the peer review process; and 3) means for
responding to criticism. We will consider strategies in
composing the manuscript and presenting data in written,
tabular and graphic form, and will compare styles and
formats. We will review common flaws that interfere with
understanding or acceptance of the paper. We will
discuss how a manuscript is processed during the review
and rebuttal. And, we will consider the responsibilities
of authors, reviewers and editors in the overall
process. The participants will be encouraged to discuss
the materials as they are presented and engage actively
in the seminar.
George Lister, Yale University School of Medicine,
New Haven, CT
1:00pm-3:00pm
Educational Seminar
ES22
Navigating the Academic Waters as a Physician (Basic)
Scientist
This workshop is aimed at the
M.D. junior faculty member (or fellow) in a department
of pediatrics. The goals of the workshop will be to: (1)
Review career paths in academic medicine, focusing on
career decisions that are key to developing an
independent research program; (2) Choosing a research
project (asking a good question); (3) Carrying out a
research project during the earliest stages of one’s
career (taking advantage of opportunities and
surmounting obstacles); (4) Moving beyond a
"research project" to development of a
research program. In anticipation of the workshop,
participants are encouraged to reflect on the career
choices and research decisions they have already made,
and to come prepared to participate in an open
discussion about these choices.
Philip A. Gruppuso, Rhode Island Hospital,
Providence, RI
1:00pm-3:00pm
Educational Seminar
ES23
Opportunities for Leadership
This workshop will discuss the
multiple paths to academic leadership. There will be
three distinct perspectives presented: (1) leadership at
an institutional level—climbing the academic ladder;
(2) leadership at an organizational level—opportunities
to become involved with national organizations such as
the American Academy of Pediatrics, the Ambulatory
Pediatric Association, American Pediatric Society; and
(3) networking: differences in gender styles and
opportunities. There will be a panel discussion
following individual presentations and an opportunity
for workshop participants to discuss their personal
experiences.
Carol D. Berkowitz, Harbor/UCLA Medical Center,
Torrance, CA; and Carmelita Britton, Section Head,
General Pediatrics, Associate Professor of Pediatrics,
Albany Medical College, Albany, NY
Sponsored jointly with the APS Workgroup on Pediatric
Leadership for the Future
1:00pm-3:00pm
Educational Seminar
ES24
Publish/Don't Perish!
The publication and
dissemination of new knowledge has long been the gold
standard of academic pediatrics. However, inertia
remains a substantial barrier to successful publications
and presentations for many faculty. A well-organized and
systematic approach to the presentation of scientific
data can substantially reduce the impediments to success
and lead to high-quality and well-received efforts. This
seminar will take a practical and focused approach to
the conceptualization, derivation and presentation of
scientific material to be presented as a manuscript,
abstract or oral presentation. Group discussions,
critique and analysis will be an inherent component of
this seminar.
Norman J. Siegel, Department of Pediatrics, Yale
University School of Medicine, Yale-New Haven Children's
Hospital, New Haven, CT
1:00pm-3:00pm
Educational Seminar
ES25
Take This Job and Love It: What You Need To Know and Do
To Be an Effective Physician Leader
As healthcare organizations
become more complex, "boundary-spanning"
leadership roles are critical. Organizations are looking
for physician leaders who can perform clinical (quality
of care, performance improvement, safety) and
administrative (planning, budgeting, business
development) tasks. The goal is to equip these
academic/clinical /research leaders with the knowledge
and skills to enable them to confidently and competently
move their organizations forward.
Over 2,000 management books are published each year.
The essential content ultimately can be distilled into
four key categories: (1) creating the vision—what you
and your organization aspire to be; (2) teamwork and
change—transforming the organization to enact that
vision; (3) earning the right to grow by strengthening
current financial performance, hiring and retaining good
people, and managing your core business effectively; and
(4) growth strategies—enacting the business plan and
making the hard decisions.
David J. Fisher, The Ohio State University &
Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH; and Thomas N. Hansen,
Ohio State University & Children's Hospital,
Columbus, OH
1:00pm-3:00pm
Educational Seminar
ES26
Teaching—An Old Art with New Skills
Teaching is something we do
daily. Learning, however, depends on the effectiveness
of our teaching. Active learning is far superior to
passive learning and is related to teaching
interactively. The purpose of the seminar is to
facilitate learning successful interactive techniques
for planned or spontaneous lectures to large groups,
small groups activities and one-on-one encounters. Both
formative and summative evaluations are also essential,
and the distinctions and formats for these will be
discussed and demonstrated. The seminar will consist of
short presentations, demonstrations, group discussions,
participatory exercises and self and group assessments.
William B. Weil, Michigan State University, College
of Human Medicine, East Lansing, MI; and Arthur F.
Kohrman, Northwestern University School of Medicine,
Chicago, IL
1:00pm-3:00pm
Educational Seminar
ES27
The NICHD: How It Works and Opportunities for Research
Support
Participants in this seminar
will receive information on how the NIH receives,
assigns, reviews and funds applications for support of
various types of research, training and career
development. The variety of support mechanisms available
at different career stages will be described, along with
areas of special current research interest to the
National Institute of Child Health and Human
Development.
Duane Alexander, National Institute of Child Health
and Human Development, National Institutes of Health,
Bethesda, MD; and Linda L. Wright, National Institute of
Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes
of Health, Bethesda, MD
3:15pm-5:15pm
APA Committee
4300
APA Education Committee
5:15pm-7:15pm
Poster Session I (Author Attended)
and Opening Reception
– Education
Sunday, May 5, 2002
8:00am-10:00am
Topic Symposium
5001
Measuring and Improving Quality in Academic Medical
Centers
Chair: Michael Apkon, Yale
University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
Applying scientific approaches
to quality management presents an important leadership
challenge for Academic Medical Centers to enhance health
care delivery. This symposium will review new paradigms
with which to examine opportunities for measuring and
improving the process of care delivery. The symposium
will also consider areas of congruence as well as areas
of opposition between the educational and care-delivery
missions of Academic Medical Centers where
often-competing interests of research, clinical care,
and education create a particularly challenging
environment for quality management.
The Case for Quality
Michael Apkon, Yale University School of Medicine,
New Haven, CT
Measuring the Quality of Care
Rita Mangione-Smith, University of California, Los
Angeles, CA
Comparing Quality Across Institutions
Murray M. Pollack, Children's National Medical
Center, George Washington University School of Medicine,
Washington, DC
Pediatric Outcomes Measurement in Academic Medical
Centers
Jeffrey H. Silber, The Children's Hospital of
Philadelphia and the University of Pennsylvania School
of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
Aligning the Missions of Providing Care and Educating
Physicians
Martha Radford, Yale University School of Medicine,
Yale New Haven Health System, New Haven, CT
Discussion
8:00am-11:00am
Workshops
5100
Beyond P Values: Inference in Clinical Research
Observational research studies
have become increasingly complex both in design and
analysis. The results of observational research studies
can be driven by properties other than chance or direct
causation. These factors not only drive the p values of
the results, they also change the appropriate
interpretation.
In the first half of this workshop, we will formally
define confounding, effect modification, intermediate
variables, internal vs external generalizability,
selection bias, and differential/nondifferential
information bias. In the second half, we will use a
case-based approach to illustrate examples of studies in
which results are driven by these factors and compare
differences in the appropriate interpretation in their
presence and absence. Participants will be invited to
interpret a given study and its data analysis then
encouraged to consider factors presented in the first
half of the workshop. Time permitting, we will
specifically illustrate examples of effect modification
vs confounding, intermediate variables vs confounding,
selection bias in case control studies vs cohort
studies, restriction vs selection bias, power in
negative studies, analysis of infectious disease
clusters, and the role of measurement error in
determining effect estimates. While an understanding of
basic study design (i.e., case control vs cohort) will
be necessary, minimal math skills will be needed.
R. O. Wright, D. K. Shay, Department of Pediatrics,
Brown Medical School, Providence, RI and Centers for
Disease Control, Atlanta GA
5101
Beyond Smoking Outside: The Pediatrician’s Role in
Helping Families To Stop Smoking
The effects of parental
smoking on children’s health are well known, yet
pediatricians are often hesitant to actively assist
parents to quit smoking. Recent research has identified
methods and windows of opportunity that can be most
effectively utilized by pediatricians. Brief
interventions in the context of pediatric primary care
have been shown to produce parental quit rates of 5–8%.
Pediatricians cite lack of confidence in their ability
to advise parents about how to stop, lack of true
physician–patient relationship with the parent,
concern that parents will receive the suggestions
negatively, and lack of time as reasons to not intervene
with parents who smoke.
Didactic content of this workshop includes the
biology of nicotine addiction and withdrawal, behavioral
and pharmacological treatment for nicotine addiction,
and the AHRQ Clinical Practice Guidelines for Smoking
Cessation. Effective strategies for implementing the
AHRQ guidelines in pediatric offices will be discussed.
There will be an opportunity to role-play smoking
cessation interventions for parents. The faculty will
share examples of practical office systems changes based
on their experience in training pediatricians and staff
to address parental tobacco use.
J. Groner, G. French, D. Moss, T. Syed, Departments
of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
and University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
5102
Choosing and Using Health Status Instruments
The development of measurement
tools that obtain the perspectives of children and
parents about child health is the most concrete example
of the recent progress of pediatric outcomes research.
Although several generic and disease-specific health
status tools for children and adolescents are now
available for use in clinical and outcomes research, it
is not always obvious which measurement tool to use in a
given research project. Moreover, there are important
methodologic considerations inherent in obtaining
children’s and adolescents’ self-reports on their
health.
The purpose of this workshop is to provide
participants with the knowledge and skills needed to
select and use health status instruments in child health
research. The workshop leaders will present a framework
for choosing the right health status instrument for a
specific application. Topics covered will include:
conceptual models; psychometric issues unique to
obtaining child and teen self-reports; measurement
reliability and validity; sensitivity to developmental
differences and changes in health; child vs parent proxy
response; instrument scoring; and, an approach for
defining measurement requirements. This framework will
be used during a hands-on, interactive session during
which participants will review and evaluate a variety of
actual disease-specific and generic health status
instruments.
C. B. Forrest and A. Riley, Department of Health
Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public
Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
5103
Developing a Curriculum for Fellowship Research
Education: Planning the Process
Fellowship programs in
Academic General Pediatrics and other related
disciplines are educating the future leaders in child
health research. Educational experiences in research, as
well as resources for research education, are variable
in these fellowship programs. In order to support
fellowship programs in their research education
activities, this workshop will convene fellowship
directors, child health researchers, and pediatric
educators with the following objectives: (1) Review the
present state of knowledge of fellowship curricula and
their evaluation: (2) Review existing models of
fellowship research curricula, including structure
(coursework, research experiences, mentorship
opportunities), content, and evaluation; (3) Discuss the
spectrum of fellowship research education, from minimum
recommendations for all fellowship programs to centers
of excellence; (4) Develop a "working" outline
of a fellowship research curriculum; (5) Institute and
organize working groups to take the products of this
workshop and develop a proposed curriculum during the
next year; (6) Consider the role of APA and sister
organizations in fellowship research training, including
disseminating fellowship research curricular guidelines,
evaluating outcomes, and sponsoring research
mini-courses to supplement research education within the
fellowship programs. We welcome the involvement of
pediatric educators skilled in curricular development
and evaluation both before and during the workshop.
B. P. Dreyer and D. J. Schonfeld, New York
University, New York, NY, and Yale University, New
Haven, CT (for the Research Committee)
Sponsored jointly with the APA Research Committee
5104
Developmental and Cultural Concepts: Children's and
Parents' Understanding of Illness
Numerous studies document
systematic developmental stages and cultural differences
in how children and adults understand physical and
psychological conditions. These developmental and
cultural differences are related to families’ health
seeking behaviors and coping strategies. They are
important to the recognition of symptoms, the
understanding of diagnoses, and compliance with
appropriate treatments.
In this interactive workshop, a panel of
investigators will briefly present research findings
from developmental psychology and pediatrics and medical
anthropology that inform clinical work with children and
adults across ages and cultural contexts. The panel will
include, in addition to ourselves, David Schonfeld, Lee
Pachter and Pradeep Gidwani whose research addresses
AIDS, cancer, asthma and ADHD among other conditions.
Videotaped interviews and role-plays will highlight key
concepts and guide a discussion of methods to improve
communications with families by integrating this body of
research into clinical interactions. Break-out groups,
led by each member of panel, will follow to discuss the
clinical implications of this research and to develop
ideas for future research.
J. M. McMenamy, E. C. Perrin, Center for Children
with Special Needs, Department of Pediatrics, Tufts
University/New England Medical Center, Boston, MA
5105
Portfolios for Residency Education: Fostering
Self-Directed Learning and Evaluating Competencies
This workshop is designed for
Pediatric Faculty to explore the usefulness of Resident
portfolios. Learning portfolios keep in step with two
increasingly prominent trends in medical education:
fostering self-directed learning and evaluating
competencies. We will demonstrate ways our programs are
using portfolios: for a PL1 Health & Development
curriculum, a PL2 Behavioral-Developmental rotation, a
Neonatal Intensive care rotation and a Medical
Informatics rotation. Participants using this
methodology are invited to bring samples of their own
institution's efforts.
Objectives for participants include:
- Identifying facets of this methodology that
promote learning
- Identifying potential difficulties with
implementation of use of portfolios
- Identifying aspects of residency education for
which portfolios might or might not be useful
- Identifying how use of portfolios might help
faculty better evaluate competencies as outlined by
the ACGME—especially for the constructs of Medical
Knowledge, Practice-based Learning and Improvement,
System-based Practice and Professionalism (i.e.,
those areas which are often more difficult to assess
than Patient Care)
Components of the portfolios which will be discussed
include: purposes, design of Learning Tasks, evaluation
methods, strategies for obtaining resident and faculty
participation. Participants will then have an
opportunity to identify for their own program an area in
which they might trial the use of portfolios. They will
have time in this workshop to develop initial steps that
can then be further developed on return to their home
institution. We anticipate this being a very
"working" workshop, with participants creating
a product that can be readily adapted for
implementation.
V. N. Niebuhr, P. S. Beach, S. Keeney, A. Spooner.
Dept. of Pediatrics, Univ. of Texas Medical Branch,
Galveston, TX, and Dept. of Pediatrics, Univ. of
Tennessee at Memphis, Memphis, TN
5106
Reducing Medication Errors – Time To Take Action
Each year there are thousands
of injuries and deaths in U.S. hospitals from medication
errors. These blunders cost millions of dollars and
result in loss of public confidence in our health care
system. Medication errors are the second most frequent
and the second most expensive event causing liability
claims. Errant orders on the inpatient unit and
incorrect prescriptions in the ED and clinics are
common. Physicians, nurses, pharmacists, students,
manufacturers and even caregivers all share
responsibility. Many errors are preventable.
This workshop will focus on common sources of medical
errors and ways to prevent them. Workshop leaders will
discuss specific issues including:
- Root cause analysis looking at systems issues
rather than individuals
- Moving toward non-punitive approaches to reporting
errors
- Developing teaching programs for housestaff and
students
- The role of the pharmacist—how can they help?
- New technology—are computer systems useful? Are
the programs affordable?
- Creating multidisciplinary medication use process
improvement teams
- Approaching the family after a medical error—legal
and ethical implications
Participants will be asked to share their ideas and
experiences. It is hoped that participants will be able
to develop a multidisciplinary program in their own
institutions to reduce and manage medical errors.
S. Selbst, S. Levine, A.I. duPont Hospital for
Children, * Wilmington, DE, and J. Fein, J. Gould, M.
Friedman, C. Mull, Children’s Hospital of
Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
5107
Teaching Ethics from Daily Patient Care
People often stereotype ethics
as about end-of-life or as requiring an ethics
committee. But everyday pediatric practice is rich with
issues for teaching ethics.
This workshop will focus on identifying the ethical
issues that surround pediatricians' in their routine
practice and how to teach ethics from these examples.
Participants will enhance their skills in ethical
analysis, using the "Tools of the Trade"
assembled by Dr. Burck, an ethicist at RPSLMC. The
workshop will model the constructivist interactive
case-based process that has been used at RPSLMC to
develop the ethics noon conference curriculum. For each
topic, the workshop will begin with a warm-up exercise,
then small group discussion of cases, large group review
of reports from small groups and closing summary of key
ethics concepts and skills used. The group will go
through this process multiple times in order to deepen
the conceptualization and educational approach each
time. Workshop participants will be able to take home
the cases that have been used at RPSLMC and a summary of
the "Tools of the Trade."
At workshop end, participants should more confidently
identify ethical issues in daily practice, teach from
them, and generalize to difficult issues, like
end-of-life.
C. Gaebler and R. Burck, Department of Pediatrics and
Program in Ethics, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical
Center, Chicago, IL
5108
Training Residents To Serve the Underserved: A
Case-Based Approach
As part of a national effort
funded by the APA and MCHB, a set of "teaching
modules" on topics related to underserved
populations was created with the help of a national
advisory board. Each module is centered on a case and
includes a "tutor guide", audiovisual and
other materials. The goal of this workshop is to provide
faculty with the tools to effectively teach residents
about underserved populations. Participants will also
learn more about case-based teaching by observing and
participating in demonstrations of these tools.
The workshop will consist of three parts: (1) A brief
presentation on the development of the teaching
materials, followed by an interactive discussion of
case-based teaching methods. (2) A breakout session
where each group will participate in a mock clinic
conference. Each facilitator will model the use of a
different case. (3) The entire group will reconvene for
a discussion of the barriers to using this curriculum at
individual institutions and strategies for overcoming
those barriers. Methods for improving the curriculum and
updating material will be actively solicited.
Copies of all 8 completed modules (12 more are
currently in production) will be distributed.
Participants are invited to contribute to the ongoing
research on the materials effectiveness. These cases
will also be available through the web for distribution
at www.servingtheunderserved.org.
R. C. Samuels, D. M. Keller, W. Risko, W. G. Bithoney,
Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, University of
Massachusetts Medical School, Worchester MA, and St.
Joseph’s Children's Hospital, Patterson, NJ
8:00am-11:00am
Special Interest Group
5113
Medical Student Education
The Medical Student Education
SIG is dedicated to being a home for all people who are
interested in medical education. As such, its activities
are relevant to a wide variety of people. Education, and
its close cousin, effective communication are critical
areas for those who identify with Faculty Development,
Injury Prevention, Emergency Medicine, Residency
Training, Continuity Clinic, and Informatics to name a
representative few.
The goals of the SIG were and are to:
- Identify and influence the agenda of medical
education and
- To provide a home base for anyone who sees medical
education as critical.
Our unique charge is to enlighten the education
community in education, through the eyes of the student.
As usual, this year’s program will include
camaraderie, creativity, warmth and food to nourish all
who attend. We plan to continue the tradition of O. J.
Sahler, Rich Sarkin and Helen Loeser—past SIG chairs—in
this mission.
Title: Bringing Competencies to Life
Target Audience: Anyone involved in medical student,
resident and continuing education
This year’s SIG will build on last year’s
presentation on competency-based evaluation.
The goal this year is to enhance our approach to
facilitating learning by both defining and
operationalizing competencies in core areas as defined
by the AAMC and ACGME. These organizations have defined
a number of "core competencies," which serve
as our guide to medical education.
The program will include:
- A brief overview of competency based education.
- Review of ACGME and AAMC core competencies.
- Group work to define competencies and describe
methods for facilitating the learning of these
competencies. We will focus on 1–3 of the
"core areas". Some of these are:
- Professionalism/Humanism
- Informatics
- Patient Care (Including History Taking/ Physical
Examination/ Decision Making
- Communication Skills (Patient Education/ Behavior
Change)
- Health Care Systems (Access/Advocacy/Community
Health)
- Cultural Considerations
- Basic Science Applications (Genetics)
- Review of evaluation checklists and other
feedback/evaluation tools, such as Brief Structured
Observation. This will include sharing of ideas on
how to implement these tools into the day to day
clinical work.
Chair: Steve Miller, szm1@columbia.edu
8:00am-11:00am
Special Interest Group
5116
Pediatric Resident
This will be our first meeting of the newly formed
Pediatric Resident Special Interest Group! Our group will
provide residents and fellows with a much-needed forum for
discussion, support, advice, mentorship, and varied
educational experiences. By sharing different approaches
and solutions to key issues in training programs, members
of the Pediatric Resident SIG will be able to:
- Aid in the transition from medical student to
resident
- Aid in the transition from resident to fellow
- Learn how to handle the stress of long work hours
and sleep deprivation
- Receive financial advice about loan repayment and
retirement funds
- Learn about fellowship opportunities and the
application process
- Learn about different career choices
- Learn effective teaching techniques
- Learn about end of life care issues
- Learn to recognize and solve ethical dilemmas
- Network with other residents interested in areas
such as advocacy or research.
Our first meeting will include a workshop/discussion on
how to be an effective teacher and student during morning
rounds, ethical issues facing Pediatric Residents, and an
interactive talk by Richard Behrman, MD (editor of Nelson's
Pediatrics) on pediatric residency education.
We also will dialogue with several Pediatric
Residency Program Directors and finally, we will discuss
amongst ourselves those issues in residency we feel to be
most pressing and important.
Chairs: Joshua
Schiffman, MD, Pediatric
Resident, Stanford University School of Medicine, joshua.schiffman@stanford.edu
and Rebecca Ryder, MD, Pediatric Resident, University of
Florida College of Medicine, rryder@ufl.edu
11:45am-1:45pm
Poster Session II (Author Attended)
– General Pediatrics and
Preventive Pediatrics
1:45pm-2:30pm
State of the Art Plenary
5590
Children as Victims of Bioterrorism: Protecting the
Fragile Host
Chairs: Phyllis Dennery,
Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA
and Tina Lee Cheng, Johns Hopkins University School of
Medicine, Baltimore, MD
With the recent world events
and new threats of biowarfare, what should pediatricians
know? Due to their size and physiology, children are at
higher risk of injury from bioterrorism. This session
will address the biology, clinical manifestations, and
possible preventive strategies for likely biowarfare
agents. The unique vulnerability of the child will be
addressed.
Overview
Phyllis A. Dennery, Stanford University School of
Medicine, Palo Alto, CA
Children as Victims of Bioterrorism: Protecting the
Fragile Host
Ralph D. Feigin, Baylor College of Medicine,
Houston, TX
Discussion
2:00pm-4:00pm
State of the Art Plenary
5701
Children as Research Subjects: Ethical and Regulatory
Issues
Chair: Myron Genel, Yale
University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
A number of highly publicized
adverse events, including the death of two volunteers
participating in non-therapeutic research, and the
federal shutdown of research at many well-recognized
academic institutions because of inadequate compliance
with regulatory requirements have intensified scrutiny
of the protection afforded to human subjects
participating in research, including children.
Furthermore a Maryland court has recently decreed that
children cannot participate in research without the
potential for direct benefit. As a consequence there has
been increasing media attention and Congressional
concern regarding the adequacy of institutional
oversight and investigator attentiveness to established
standards and regulations. In addition, new regulations
issued under the Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act of l996(HIPAA) threaten the capacity
to conduct health services and outcomes research. These
issues will be addressed in the 9th annual Public Policy
Plenary Symposium in an interactive format intended to
stimulate dialogue among the members of the panel and
with the audience.
Overview
Myron Genel, Yale University School of Medicine, New
Haven, CT
Overseeing Research in Children: New Concerns and New
Regulations
Alan R. Fleischman, The New York Academy of
Medicine, New York, NY
International Health Research: Where Bioethics,
Politics and Economics Converge
Eric M. Meslin, Indiana University Center for
Bioethics, Indianapolis, IN
Compliance: What You and Your Institution Need to
Know (and Do)
Pearl O'Rourke, Partners HealthCare System, Inc.,
Boston, MA
HIPAA, Privacy & Confidentiality and Research In
Children?
Brian Kamoie, The George Washington University,
Washington, DC
Discussion
Sponsored jointly with the Public Policy Council
of the APS, AMSPDC, SPR and the Public Policy Committee
of the APA
Partially supported by an educational grant from
Columbus Children's Hospital
2:00pm-5:00pm
Workshops
5600
A Curriculum for Disclosing Medical Errors: Responding
to the Joint Commission Imperative
Release of the Institute of
Medicine Report (1999) has increased public awareness of
the existence of errors in the practice of medicine. The
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare
Organizations (JCAHO) has issued a directive that
medical errors be disclosed to patients and families.
Healthcare organizations need strategies to ensure
compliance, yet many questions remain: What represents a
disclosable medical error? Is there a means of reaching
consensus among professionals and how does one share
with families in the most constructive ways possible?
This workshop will focus on a program developed at
Vanderbilt designed to help medical groups reach
consensus concerning what represents an error and
understand existing literature concerning the
consequences of disclosure. Using a case-based approach
participants will be afforded an opportunity to share
such sensitive information through role-play and
"audience lifeline" techniques. The program
will emphasize that there is no single correct approach
given the complexity of medicine and differences in
families and physicians. Participants will be encouraged
to use a "balance beam approach" in which
physicians (pediatricians) consider all possible
disclosure strategies ranging from limited to full
disclosure with assignment of responsibility and the
relative advantages and disadvantages of each approach.
Participants should be better equipped to share highly
sensitive information with families and adapt course
concepts into their own institutions.
G. B. Hickson, J. W. Pichert, J. Gigante, Vanderbilt
Children’s Hospital, Nashville, TN
5601
Creating a Competency-Based Evaluation Portfolio
The paradigm shift to
competency-based medical education warrants a close
examination of methods of evaluation of clinical
competence. Through this workshop we propose to: 1)
demonstrate a number of tools available for evaluation
of medical students and residents and 2) discuss which
tools are most appropriate for evaluation of specific
competencies. Finally, we hope to create an evaluation
portfolio for a virtual resident in a competency-based
training program.
There will be a brief introduction to a variety of
possible assessment tools, such as the Brief Structured
Observation, the OSCE, 3600 evaluations, and
standardized histories and physicals. Participants will
then be assigned to one of six small groups, each group
representing one of the six ACGME Outcomes Project
competencies. Each group will be asked to identify those
tools most appropriate for evaluation of a number of
knowledge, skill and attitude benchmarks/performance
indicators within each competency. Based on feedback
from the groups, we will then create a competency-based
evaluation portfolio for a virtual resident.
C. Carraccio and R. Englander, University of
Maryland, Baltimore, MD
5602
Developing Effective Resident as Teacher Programs
At teaching hospitals
residents universally serve as teachers and are
essential to the education of medical students and
interns; however, residents and faculty are often not
assisted in developing teaching skills. Two challenges
exist: to develop residents as teachers and to develop
effective teaching programs to teach them how to teach.
This interactive, hands-on workshop will provide the
participants with the opportunity to analyze three
Resident as Teacher programs that represent different
approaches to program development and teaching. Workshop
facilitators will use interactive teaching methods,
small and large group formats, and audience
participation to analyze how to design effective
resident teaching programs. In analyzing three different
approaches we will address curricular development,
implementation and evaluation.
Written materials will be provided that participants
can use in their own residency programs.
E. A. Rider, Dept of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical
School, Boston, MA, R. T. Sarkin, Dept of Pediatrics,
SUNY at Buffalo School of Medicine, Buffalo, NY, K.
Pituch, Dept of Pediatrics, Univ. of Michigan School of
Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, and J. P. Hafler, Dept of
Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
5603
Developing Faculty To Teach Child Advocacy
The Pediatric RRC now requires
that residents be prepared "for the role of
advocate for the health of children within the
community." Programs have addressed this
requirement through community block rotations,
longitudinal experiences, lectures, workshops and
service-learning experiences. A common problem, voiced
in the APA Advocacy Training SIG meetings, is lack of
preceptors to teach and model child advocacy within
their programs to reinforce the message that child
advocacy is part of good pediatric practice.
This workshop will allow participants to learn how to
promote the teaching of child advocacy by academic and
community preceptors in pediatric residency.
Participants will: 1) participate in an interactive
discussion of child advocacy to develop a working
definition that fits their clinical setting, 2) identify
faculty at their institutions who could serve as models
and mentors for advocacy training, 3) discuss training
methods used at our institutions (scavenger hunt/ photo
essay, community connections and case-based advocacy
projects) to promote teaching and learning about
community involvement and child advocacy and 4) work in
small groups to adapt these methods to each participant’s
home institutions and present the results to the
workshop. The participants will be enrolled in a
post-workshop LISTSERVE to share experiences over the
ensuing year.
D. M. Keller, J. A. Andrake, S. Starr and E. Schulte,
UMass Medical School, Worcester, MA, SUNY Upstate
Medical University, Syracuse, NY, and Albany Medical
College, Albany, NY
5604
Evaluation of Curricular Innovations and Program Designs
in Medical Education Research
In education, research is often
focused on the determination of progress that students
have made toward educational goals. These studies use
methodologies that not only determine outcomes but also
analyze the process with which these outcomes are
derived. Researchers in medical education are often
faced with the difficulty of defending their
methodologies to "peer-reviewers" who are
accustomed to quantitative analysis of traditional
scientific papers.
The methodologies in educational research may be
classified into two broad categories: quantitative and
qualitative studies. For medical education research,
quantitative studies focus on the outcomes of the study
while qualitative studies explore the process. Both
types of research are necessary and should be selected
based on the research question. In addition, the view of
scholarship in medical education not only encompasses
the methodologies, but also the rigor with which these
methodologies are applied to the program design.
This workshop will address the use of varying
methodologies in medical education research by reviewing
the evaluation methods for several innovative curricular
programs. By comparing and contrasting the methodologies
employed in each of the studies, participants will be
able to appreciate the uses of quantitative and
qualitative designs in medical education, generate
research questions and formulate a research design for
their own programs.
Kuo, G. S. Blaschke, B. S. Siegel, W. Risko, and J.
P. Hafler, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, Naval
Medical Center, San Diego, CA, Boston Medical Center,
Boston, MA, Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, and
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
5605
Handheld Computers in Clinical Pediatric Practice
Handheld computers are rapidly
evolving into an indispensable tool for the clinician.
Though handheld computers have been limited in the past
to scheduling, to-do lists, brief notes, and phone
lists, progressive application development is providing
reference tools, medical calculators, charge capture
programs, electronic prescription writing software,
procedure logs, web browsers, EMR integration, research
databases, evidence-based medicine tools, and multimedia
applications permitting access to telemedicine.
The purpose of our workshop is to provide
participants with hands-on experience employing a
variety of software applications on the most common
handheld computers. To demonstrate the utility of
applications, clinical cases will be employed.
Participants will be led through the cases step-by-step
so that firsthand experience in handheld computers will
be acquired. A brief discussion period will follow each
case to elaborate on the extended utility of presented
applications, as well as other commercially available
programs. In addition, guidelines will be introduced for
evaluating future software and technologies, as they
become available. Participants will receive a resource
list to facilitate ongoing education in the growing
field of handheld computing. No prior knowledge in the
use of handheld computers is required.
T. L. Courtney, Children¹s Hospital of The King¹s
Daughters and Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk,
VA, K. Johnson, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD,
and A. Meyers, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA
5606
Introductory Techniques for Pediatric Research
Clinical pediatricians are
often interested in a number of potential research
topics but have difficulty translating their ideas into
coherent research projects. This workshop is designed to
provide clinically oriented pediatricians with the basic
epidemiologic and analytic tools needed to plan, design,
and begin to analyze a clinical research project.
The primary activity of this workshop will be working
through an exercise developed by the workshop leaders.
The exercise will open with a proposed research topic.
The workshop attendees and leaders will work through the
exercise together to develop a research strategy that
includes the development of an appropriate research
hypothesis, the selection of proper outcome measures and
the type of data that should be collected. The exercise
will then work through a preliminary organization and
analysis of data provided in the exercise. Brief
didactic interludes will be woven into the workshop
exercise and will focus on commonly used, and often
misunderstood, statistical tools such as relative risks,
odds ratios, confidence intervals and p-values. A
personal computer will be used to demonstrate the use of
those techniques with the data included in the exercise.
K. C. Schoendorf and W. G. Adams. National Center for
Health Statistics, CDC, Hyattsville, MD, and Department
of Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA
5607
Moving Resident Competencies from Edict to
Implementation in the Continuity Setting: Developing an
Individualized Learning Plan (ILP)
This faculty workshop will
help participants develop tools for the implementation
of competency-based assessment in the continuity setting
using the ILP as an approach to monitoring resident
performance. We will review the six professional
competencies determined by the ABMS and ACGME: patient
care, professionalism, interpersonal and communication
skills, medical knowledge, practice-based learning and
improvement and systems-based practice. A draft of the
pediatric RRC specialty-specific components, timeline
for implementation and suggested assessment tools will
also be discussed.
Attendees will break into subgroups to focus on one
of three competencies particularly suited to being
taught in the continuity setting: 1) professionalism; 2)
interpersonal and communication skills; and 3)
practice-based learning and improvement. Each subgroup
collaboratively will develop an ILP for resident
assessment at the outset of residency and for monitoring
progress throughout training (e.g., to assess
effectiveness in specific interpersonal skills and
communication, programs may elect to include data in the
ILP from patient/parent satisfaction surveys obtained at
regularly, scheduled intervals). Subgroups will present
their ILP templates for group discussion. A summary from
the three subgroups will be mailed after the meeting to
all participants for their use.
W. Davis, P. Algranati, R. Collins, J. Drutz, M.
Dumont-Driscoll, S. Feigelman, D. Kittredge, J. Olsson,
S. Riesen, and J. Serwint, APA Continuity SIG Task Force
Sponsored jointly with the APA Continuity Directors
SIG
5608
Pediatric Obesity: Practical Evaluation and Treatment
Strategies for Primary Care Providers
The United States is
experiencing an epidemic of pediatric obesity. However,
many primary care providers report that obesity is one
of the most frustrating and difficult problems in their
practices. In this workshop, we will provide practical
strategies for evaluating and treating obese children in
primary care. To maximize learning and relevance the
session will be split. Approximately one-third of the
session will focus on expert committee recommendations
for evaluation and behavioral treatment strategies. We
will address skills for identification of obesity,
screening for both rare endogenous causes of obesity and
more common obesity-associated conditions or risk
factors, assessment of emotional and psychosocial
states, eating and activity assessment, and indications
for consultation with an obesity specialist. For
treatment, we will address the most successful
strategies for diet and physical activity counseling,
changing the household environment, self-monitoring,
goal setting and contracting, parenting skills training,
maintenance and relapse prevention, and the potential
role of drug therapies. The other two-thirds of the
session will consist of case discussions and group
problem solving. Cases will address practical evaluation
and management challenges facing primary care providers.
T. N. Robinson and S. E. Barlow, Dept. of Pediatrics,
Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, and Dept. of
Pediatrics, St. Louis University School of Medicine, St.
Louis, MO
5609
Using Systematic Review Evidence To Inform Clinical
Decision Making in Children
The Cochrane Child Health
Field facilitates the identification, organization,
dissemination and utilization of up-to-date synthesized
research evidence about effective care for children. The
overall aim of child-focused systematic reviews of
effectiveness should be to improve the quality of health
care, and ultimately health outcomes for children. This
is likely to be achieved only if relevant research
findings are accessed, interpreted and appropriately
incorporated into practice by health care providers.
The challenges of incorporating effective
evidence-based practices into daily health care
decisions are indeed large. Health care providers have
access to a large volume of high quality research
evidence and guidance about effectiveness, including
electronic publications of systematic reviews in the
Cochrane Library. What issues does the health care
provider face when questioning whether evidence is
applicable to a specific clinical question? What does a
health care provider do when faced with results of
systematic reviews that appear to report conflicting
evidence?
Cochrane Child Health Field leaders will facilitate
an interactive discussion with workshop participants to
address the above questions, using the meta-analyses
from the Cochrane library and paper-based journals as
working examples. Attendees will learn how to deal with
publication bias, quality of included RCTs, grey
literature and RCTs published in languages other than
English. Challenges with dealing with evidence from
Complementary and Alternative Medicine will also be
explored.
T. P. Klassen, Cochrane Child Health Field, Stollery
Children’s Hospital, Professor and Chair, Department
of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada,
Maureen O’Donnell, Women’s and Children’s Health
Centre of British Columbia and Department of Pediatrics,
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada,
Virginia Moyer, The University of Texas Medical School
at Houston, Houston, TX, and R. Armstrong, Women’s and
Children’s Health Centre of British Columbia and
Department of Pediatrics, University of British
Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
4:15pm-6:15pm
Poster Symposium
5906
Neonatal Epidemiology and Follow-Up
Chairs: Mark A. Klebanoff
and Saroj Saigal
Monday, May 6, 2002
8:00am-10:00am
Topic Symposium
6002
The Scholarship of Teaching: How Can Excellence Be
Judged?
Chair: Kenneth Roberts,
Moses Cone Health System, Greensboro, NC
It has been argued that the
education of future physicians is the only unique task
of an academic medical center, given that both clinical
care and research can be and are done in other settings
and institutions. Achieving this task requires excellent
clinical teachers, and such individuals constitute an
essential resource in a department of pediatrics.
Protecting and nurturing this resource by providing
appropriate recognition, promotion and compensation for
individuals who have achieved excellence as teachers is
therefore essential, but what criteria should be used to
determine excellence in teaching?
In this symposium, the presenters, all of whom are
interested in teaching and teachers, will address their
ideas regarding excellence and how it can be recognized.
Introduction: Framing the Question
Kenneth B. Roberts, Past President APA and APPD,
Moses Cone Health System, Greensboro, NC
Documentation of Excellence in Teaching: Expectations
of a Chair
F. Bruder Stapleton, University of Washington School
of Medicine, Seattle, WA
Demonstrating Excellence in Teaching
Richard Sarkin, Past President COMSEP, University at
Buffalo School of Medicine, Buffalo, NY
Discussion
9:00am-12:00pm
Workshops
6100
Achieving Cultural Competency in Pediatrics
The United States rapidly is
growing more culturally diverse. In several cities,
whites already are in the minority. Culture has a
profound impact on pediatrics, affecting multiple
aspects of clinical care, including outcomes, processes,
quality, satisfaction, obtaining an accurate history,
and adherence. Cultural competency is the ability to
recognize and appropriately respond to key cultural
characteristics that affect clinical care in the major
cultural groups seen in your practice. In this workshop,
participants will learn about a model of cultural
competency that can be applied to any cultural group
that might be encountered by the pediatrician. This
model is based on five aspects of culture that affect
clinical care: 1) normative cultural values; 2) language
issues; 3) folk illnesses; 4) parent beliefs; and 5)
provider practices. The Latino and African-American
cultures will be used to illustrate the most important
ways that culture impacts pediatric care, drawing on the
rich available literature and the personal experience of
the workshop leaders.
Using an evidence-based approach derived from
critical studies on Latino and African-American culture,
workshop participants will learn and master the cultural
competency model. Illustrative cases (including
videotapes) will be presented to challenge participants
and further solidify their skills. Participants can
expect to acquire practical skills for recognizing and
appropriately responding to crucial aspects of culture
and language that affect pediatric care.
G. Flores and G. Askew, Department of Pediatrics,
Boston Medical Center and Boston University Schools of
Medicine & Public Health, Boston, MA
6101
Caring for Gay and Lesbian Youth in Pediatric Practice
Adolescents who are gay or
lesbian, or are questioning their sexual identity, may
look to health care providers for assistance with both
medical and psychosocial issues. Yet many practicing
pediatricians are uncomfortable with their skills in
caring for gay and lesbian adolescents. At the
University of Massachusetts Medical School, we have
developed a series of workshops for university and
community clinicians that provide knowledge of health
care needs of gay and lesbian youth and model supportive
interviewing techniques. Methods include slide
presentations, interactive discussion, videotapes of
interviews with gay and lesbian youth and their parents,
modeling of "live" interviews, and a
"Teaching Kit" for helping faculty to teach
students and residents about sexuality. Preceptor
support for this curriculum has led us to pilot the
workshop in community pediatric offices, training all
office staff, including providers, social workers,
managerial and clerical staff.
In this workshop participants will: 1) participate in
an interactive demonstration of our general and
office-based workshops; 2) discuss the barriers to
teaching about sexuality in an office setting, and how
to address them; and 3) develop a "Safe Office
Kit" for their own practices that will allow them
to train their own faculty and staff.
S. Sack, E. Ferrara, S. Starr, D. M. Keller, and E.
Perrin, University of Massachusetts Medical School,
Worcester, MA, and Tufts University School of Medicine,
Boston, MA
6102
Clinical Forensic Medicine: Bridging the Gap Between
Medicine and Law
Medical practitioners who work
in acute care settings are likely to encounter forensic
issues, such as child abuse, assault or unexpected
death. However, few training programs prepare physicians
to adequately manage these issues.
Objective: This workshop is designed to increase
participant awareness of their pediatric patients’
forensic medical needs, and to review techniques for the
acute evaluation of such patients.
Methods: Experts in the fields of Pediatric Emergency
Medicine, Child Abuse and Neglect, Toxicology and
Forensic Medicine will work directly with participants
to teach them how to evaluate pediatric patients from a
forensic perspective. Workshop participants will receive
hands-on instruction in the following skills: the
detection, collection and preservation of evidence,
documentation of injuries (including medical
photography), pattern injury recognition and
interpretation of injuries, preparation for court
testimony, and reporting requirements and regulations.
During one of the segments, participants will rotate
through stations where they will utilize these skills
using state-of-the-art equipment. All registrants will
also receive a comprehensive syllabus containing
relevant information and recent references related to
the practice of Clinical Forensic Medicine that is
designed to be used as a teaching aid.
K. Bechtel, K. Santucci, L. Arnold, C. Baum J. Klig
and M. D. Baker, Section of Pediatric Emergency
Medicine, Yale-New Haven Children’s Hospital, New
Haven, CT
6103
Culture, Spirituality, and Complementary and Alternative
Pediatrics: An Applied Integrative Model
Growing attention in medical
literature has been dedicated to an increasingly
multicultural patient population, to intersections
between spirituality and medicine, and to the wide use
of complementary and alternative therapies in the United
States. Frequently, however, these three topics are
presented as unrelated to one another. Yet in practice,
they often represent intersecting fields of experience.
This workshop will introduce a model that integrates the
three topics and will present illustrative examples from
different areas of the United States.
Workshop participants will next apply this model to
their own family culture through a guided exercise. By
learning to work with a conceptual framework in direct
relation to their own experience, they will learn how an
otherwise abstract model looks in practice. They will
then engage in small group discussion of what they
observed through the exercise. During the third section
of the workshop, participants will engage in a role-play
of history-taking. They will apply the model both as a
family caretaker who has brought a child in for a
consultation, and as the pediatrician. Each role-play
will be followed by group discussion.
Through this workshop, participants will learn to
utilize a conceptual model that integrates
standard-of-care biomedical treatment, culture,
spirituality, and CAM and will recognize the importance
and rationale for adopting an integrative approach of
this kind in pediatric practice. They will also learn
tools with which to teach others this model.
L. Barnes and K. Fox, Department of Pediatrics,
Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA
6104
Design and Implementation of a Domestic Violence
Education Program for Pediatric Faculty and Residents
Domestic violence is an
important public health problem in this country. The
lack of domestic violence training in medical schools
and residency programs hampers the ability of
pediatricians to provide quality comprehensive health
supervision. In order to address this problem, our
multidisciplinary collaborative group on domestic
violence planned and implemented a domestic violence
educational program at the Children's Hospital of
Pittsburgh. This program for residents and faculty was
designed to increase awareness, improve knowledge, and
hone skills in assessing and assisting families dealing
with domestic violence. A pre- and post-intervention
survey was used to assess change and pinpoint areas of
further educational need. The goal of this workshop is
to help others produce a similar educational program in
their own academic or community setting. The workshop
will involve a discussion of how the collaborative group
evolved, how hospital interest was generated, and how
the course was designed and implemented. Attendees will
participate in the key portion of the educational
program, a two-hour mini course, which includes video
and didactic presentations and small group role-playing.
Participants will have the opportunity to develop their
own plan for creating a similar educational program in
their own clinical settings.
R. Berger, S. C. Hamel, T. Syed, K. DeAntonis, J.
Williams, B. Williams, D. Ploof, J. Syphan, Children's
Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
6105
Early Identification and Assessment of Children with an
Autism Spectrum Disorder
Pediatricians play a crucial
role in identifying infants and toddlers who may have
significant developmental needs. Recently, there has
been a growing concern about possible increases in the
numbers of children with an autism spectrum disorder (ASD).
Early identification and intervention can significantly
improve the long-term outcome for these children and
their families. Unfortunately, although symptoms of the
ASDs are generally present before 3 years of age, the
average diagnosis is not made until 4.5 years of age.
Given the unusual patterns of development shown by
children with autism in communication, social, and
behavioral skills, parents often report frustration
associated with trying to identify the nature of their
child’s needs and with accessing appropriate services.
Pediatricians can provide helpful screening and
diagnostic referral information. The aim of this
workshop is to provide information about the early signs
of children with an ASD, to identify screening
instruments for the ASDs and to describe the referral
process in case further assessment and intervention are
warranted. Workshop activities will include presentation
and discussion, video observation of children with and
without ASDs and small group evaluations of clinical
vignettes profiling a child in need of more detailed
developmental assessment. The goal is to help
pediatricians implement guidelines recently established
for identifying children with an ASD by the American
Academy of Pediatrics.
C. E. Rice, O. Y. Ousley*, and M. Yeargin-Allsopp,
National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental
Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
and *Emory University Department of Psychiatry, Atlanta,
GA
6106
Integrating Genetics Teaching into Daily Pediatric
Practice: Do I Really Need To Be Doing That?
Daily headlines flash new
genetic discoveries revolutionizing the practice of
medicine! What really has changed and what do we need to
know? The goals of this workshop are to emphasize the
relevancy of integrating genetics into every patient
encounter, enthuse participants about the impact of
rapidly exploding genetic knowledge/technology on
patient care and physician responsibility and discuss
the core genetic competencies our students need to
acquire.
During this workshop participants will have the
opportunity to review new advances in the field,
including ethical, legal and social implications. All
attendees will acquire the necessary tools and resources
to enhance their comfort in teaching genetics through
small sub-groups which will focus on stimulating
interest in this area by: 1) working through at least
two educational methods/materials that could be used at
the participant's own site; 2) discussing cases where
"missed opportunities" in genetics impacted
the physician and family in an ethical, legal or social
manner; and 3) locating at least three internet
user-friendly sites as resources for current genetic
information. The workshop, using a series of teaching
exercises, role-playing and short didactic sessions will
focus on our important role as generalists utilizing
genetics as a unifying thread in patient care.
T. Turner, M. Dumont-Driscoll, J. Gigante, and B.
Siegel
6107
Medical Homes for Children with Special Health Care
Needs: Partnership for Community-Based Care
The AAP and the MCH Bureau
advocate that community-based pediatric offices should
be designed as Medical Homes for Children with Special
Health Care Needs (CSHCN). Primary care physicians
should meet the health promotion and standard medical
care needs of children with a wide variety of medical
and developmental needs (e.g., cerebral palsy, Down
syndrome, inborn errors of metabolism, autism, HIV). Our
team (of physicians, parent coordinator and project
manager) will describe a partnership between the
Children’s Hospital, Boston and six pediatric
practices, focusing on components that have supported
and enhanced Medical Homes in the community. We will
discuss the following topics: 1) creating meaningful
coordination between primary and tertiary care through
electronic linkages, active referral networks,
Individualized Health Planning; 2) provision of relevant
continuing medical education programming for physicians
and nurse practitioners who care for CSHCN; 3) training
future physicians to practice using the medical home
model; 4) conducting research on epidemiology, systems
of care, condition specific issues, etc. that provide
necessary data for improving the health and functional
status of children with special health care needs; and
5) sponsoring consortia of physicians, parents and
others interested in improving services for CSHCN.
T. Silva, E. Davidson, L. Freeman, L. Sofis, and J.
Palfrey, Children’s Hospital, Boston and the East
Boston Neighborhood Health Center, Boston, MA
6108
Orchestrating Death in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
Approximately 10% of newborn
infants admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
will die. Many care providers may feel ill prepared to
deal with the ethical and psychosocial aspects as well
as the practical aspects of managing death.
This workshop will use a problem-based learning
approach to analyze a complex neonatal case. A brief
didactic lecture will review the following four aspects
of care: 1) ethical aspects (withdrawal of life support,
resolving decisional conflicts); 2) social aspects
(cultural diversity, conflict resolution, obtaining
autopsy requests); 3) palliative care aspects (pain
management, managing other physical discomforts); and 4)
emotional aspects (enhancing team communications,
developing parent partnerships, addressing emotional
needs of family/staff, creating supportive
environments). Following the didactic session,
participants will be divided into groups, with each
group addressing one aspect of care. Groups will use
decision-making models to analyze the case over
sequential time periods. Following group activities, the
four groups will reconvene. The workshop facilitator
will orchestrate an integrative, collaborative plan
based on input from the four groups.
The goal of this workshop is to provide participants
with an overall model by which they can more effectively
advocate for integrative health services at end of life.
C. Berseth, J. Garcia-Prats, B. Brody, and M. Walden,
Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics,
Newborn and Intensive Care Sections, Houston, TX
6109
Program Evaluation for Advocacy Interventions in
Residency Programs
Many residency programs are
implementing interventions to expose residents to
advocacy activities, enhance residency training with
regard to advocacy, and better meet the needs of
families within the communities in which they live. As
part of these activities, programs face challenges
designing and implementing appropriate evaluations to
determine whether their objectives are being met. The
purpose of this workshop is to highlight local
evaluations being conducted at 6 pediatric residency
programs as part of the Anne E. Dyson Community
Pediatrics Training Initiative and engage participants
in considering multiple aspects of program evaluations.
Using interactive breakout groups, participants will
propose possible methods and challenges of evaluating
hypothetical advocacy interventions. The workshop will:
articulate the usefulness and constraints of evaluating
advocacy interventions; describe fundamental steps to
designing and implementing successful evaluations; and
highlight purposes and creative approaches for
conducting program evaluations. Funded by The Dyson
Foundation.
C. Minkovitz, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore,
MD, M. Aten, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, D.
Bragg, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, A.
Duggan, H. Grason, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore,
MD, V. LeBlanc, Columbia University, New York, NY, K.
Minot, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia,
Philadelphia, PA, M. Zuniga de Nuncio, UCSD, San Diego,
CA
6110
Open Access Appointment Scheduling: The Cure for the
Ailing Pediatric Practice?
Same day appointment
scheduling systems, commonly referred to as Open Access
Scheduling (OAS), is offered as the solution to poor
pediatric office efficiency. Long waits, poor access to
services, malfunctioning telephone systems, disorganized
patient flow, miscommunication and strained finances are
reported symptoms of some ailing pediatric ambulatory
practices. OAS advocates in academic pediatric
continuity clinics, public sector neighborhood health
centers or in private pediatric practices heartily
endorse this novel appointment system as the cure for
these chronic problems. OAS purports to optimize access
to care while allowing the practitioner/practice to
track patients who do not re-appoint in a timely manner.
OAS relies on the themes of access, interaction,
reliability, and vitality. In its purest form, OAS
offers every patient an appointment on the day that an
appointment is requested. The motto for OAS is, "Do
today’s work today." During this workshop, OAS
experts will provide background information and specific
OAS examples from different pediatric practice settings.
A point–counterpoint debate involving workshop
participants will delineate and discuss the pros and
cons of this model. Is your ambulatory pediatric
practice in need of resuscitation? Come to this workshop
to see if OAS is the cure!
J. Brown, D. Laraque, J. Cox and G. Randolph,
Department of Pediatrics, Colorado School of Medicine,
Denver, CO, Dept. of Pediatrics, Mt. Sinai School of
Medicine, New York, NY, Dept. of Pediatrics, Harvard
Medical School, Boston, MA and Dept. of Pediatrics, U of
N. Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC and the
HCD Committee
Sponsored jointly with the APA Health Care Delivery
Committee
6111
Qualitative Research in Pediatrics
Qualitative research has
steadily acquired greater popularity and respect in
medical and health services research over the past two
decades. Increasingly, this set of methods is viewed as
complementary to traditional quantitative research
approaches. Qualitative research techniques represent a
diverse set of research methods featuring the collection
and analysis of narrative data to capture a subject’s
unfiltered view of a situation or topic. Qualitative
methods hold particular promise in certain research
activities such as medical education, ethics, quality of
care, cultural perspectives, survey research and patient–doctor
communication.
This workshop will introduce participants to
qualitative methodology and its application to research
questions in pediatrics by addressing two of the most
commonly employed methods: focus groups and ethnographic
interviewing. Participants will learn to: (1) identify
research topics appropriate for the use of qualitative
methods; (2) design a qualitative study using the two
highlighted methods; (3) organize a paper for
publication. Methodological issues such as sampling,
data collection, coding, data analysis, and validity and
reliability will be reviewed using examples from
published literature and from participants’ own
research questions.
C. Feudtner, D. C. Grossman, J. I. Takayama,
Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington,
Seattle, WA, and Department of Pediatrics, UCSF, San
Francisco, CA
9:00am-12:00pm
Special Interest Groups
6112
Faculty Development
The Faculty Development SIG is
a forum for ongoing exchange in the area of medical
education and faculty development The SIG is open to
anyone interested in these areas. The SIG will use its
List-serve to brainstorm ideas for the upcoming meeting.
Please check for detailed information on this SIG at
www.pas-meeting.org in early 2002. The SIG is cochaired
by Franklin Trimm, Charlie Gaebler-Uhing and Ronald V.
Marino. The List-serve is maintained by Michelle Barratt.
To join the List-serve contact Michelle at
Michelle.S.Barratt@uth.tmc.edu or 713-500-5810.
Cochairs: Charlie Geabler, clgaebler@aol.com,
Ron Marino, rmarino@winthrop.org,
and Franklin Trimm, ftrimm@jaguar1.usouthal.edu
6113
Health Services Research
Chair: Lawrence Kleinman, lawrence.kleinman@lvh.com
6114
Literacy Development Programs in Primary Care
This SIG supports primary care
based programs which promote reading aloud and train
clinicians to encourage early literacy development,
based on the Reach Out and Read (ROR) model. In this
year's 3-hour meeting, there will be an invited talk by
an educational specialist on early literacy development,
as well as a focused discussion of quality improvement
and implementation/outcome measures currently being used
or developed to assess and improve program quality.
There will also be presentations and updates on a
variety of research projects in progress around the
country to look at language and literacy effects of
pediatric literacy interventions. The SIG is coordinated
by Robert Needlman, MD (Case Western Reserve School of
Medicine and drspock.com) and Perri Klass, MD (Boston
University School of Medicine and Reach Out and Read).
Cochairs: Perri Klass, perri.klass@bmc.org,
and Robert Needlman, Rneedlman@drspock.com
1:30pm-5:30pm
APA Presidential Plenary
6450
APA Presidential Plenary and Armstrong Lecture
Chair: Steve Ludwig
The George Armstrong
Lecture
Steven A. Schroeder
Ray E. Helfer Award for Innovation in Pediatric
Education: Measuring Medical Knowledge Competencies
Using Web-Enhanced Instruction During a Pediatric
Resident Ambulatory Block Month
Carl E. Johnson
Larry C. Hurtubise
International Health Award: Clinical Presentation,
Immediate Outcome and Prognostic Factors of Cerebral
Malaria in Children Admitted to Mulago Hospital
Richard Idro
Distinguished Career Award
Barbara Starfield
8:00am-10:00am
Platform Session
7053
Education: Medical Students
Chairs: Bruce Z.
Morgenstern and David M. Keller
8:00am-10:00am
Platform Session
7055
Health Services Research: The Practice and the Patient
Chairs: Paul M. Darden II
and Modena Wilson
8:45am-11:45am
Workshops
7100
BaFá BaFá™: A Cross-Cultural Simulation Experience
for Medical Educators and Preceptors
Cultural sensitivity and
cultural competence have become increasingly salient
topics in medical education and practice in recent
years. Though no consisently agreed-upon definitions
have yet been formulated for either of these terms,
there is widespread consensus about many of their key
elements. Among these are self-awareness; an ability to
empathize with others; a willingness to try to "see
through others' eyes" when differences in values
and expectations make interactions challenging and
understanding difficult to achieve; and a capacity to
act upon all of these qualities in formulating workable
action plans. Originally designed as a training tool for
U.S. servicemen being stationed abroad, the
cross-cultural simulation game BaFá BaFá™ (Shirts,
1974) provides an immersion experience in cross cultural
interaction and its challenges and rewards. Participants
are assigned membership in one of two fictitious
cultures and move into separate rooms to learn the basic
values framework and interaction rules of their new
cultures (a roughly 15-minute process). Following this
brief "enculturation," the two groups exchange
smaller subgroups of visitors and observers, who
interact in their host cultures and attempt to describe
to their co-culturists their experiences with and
interpretations of the "others." When all
participants have had a chance to visit, the exchange
ends and the groups reunite to discuss and analyze their
experiences and insights. Successfully used in a wide
variety of settings, the insights produced through
participation in BaFá BaFá™ about the pervasiveness
and influence of cultural norms and worldviews will here
be applied to cross-cultural challenges in clinical
practice and medical education.
B. O'Connor and A. Alario, Division of Pediatric
Ambulatory Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital/Brown Medical
School, Providence, RI
7101
Cardiac Auscultation in Pediatrics: Interactive Workshop
To Improve Diagnostic Accuracy and Teaching
Despite advances in
sophisticated imaging tools, cardiac auscultation using
a simple stethoscope remains a powerful and fundamental
skill used by both the generalist and specialist to
discriminate disease from health. However, recent
studies have shown that proficiency among residents in
training is declining, pointing out the need for
improvements in the teaching and assessment of this
clinical skill.
This workshop is designed to improve diagnostic
accuracy and teaching of cardiac auscultation through
use of an interactive, internet-based virtual cardiology
clinic and real-time examination of actual patients.
Infrared stethophones will allow simultaneous
auscultation by all participants. Echocardiography will
be used to visually display pathologic lesions while
listening to the associated heart sounds and murmurs.
Digital technology allows slowing of heart rate,
filtering of frequencies, and graphic rendering of
sounds to improve learning.
Specific objectives include: 1) increasing accuracy
of distinguishing innocent from pathologic murmurs, 2)
improving recognition of clicks and other abnormal heart
sounds, 3) introduction of this internet tool as a new
means for group and individual learning as well as a
method for quantitative assessment of clinical skill
acquisition. The digital heart sound library can be
accessed at www.murmurlab.com.
W. Reid Thompson and Jean S. Kan, Department of
Pediatrics, The Johns Hopkins University School of
Medicine, Baltimore, MD
7102
Constructing and Presenting Workshops That Work
Workshops are a popular and
versatile method of teaching adults. From teaching a
procedure to teaching how to teach, from local retreats
to national meetings, from precepting students to
developing the skills of colleagues, workshops are
widely used in medical education. This workshop will
give participants the tools/framework necessary to
construct and lead their own effective workshops.
Facilitators of this workshop are from a variety of
institutions and are participants in the APA National
Pediatric Faculty Development Scholars Program. We will
draw from our participation in this program, our
previous experience with this workshop and current
literature to review concepts of adult learning theory
and techniques for working with small groups. Through
participatory and interactive segments, the group will
address how to conduct a needs assessment of the target
audience and use the results to plan an effective
workshop. Techniques for effective communication,
stimulating audience participation and interaction, and
evaluation will be demonstrated and practiced. During
interactive breakout sessions, participants can choose
to focus on the logistics of new workshop development or
on refining their previously developed workshops. A
listing of faculty development scholars by region will
be provided to facilitate further networking and
long-range access to workshop development expertise.
E. Zenni, J. Andrake, L. Pasquinelli, J. Christner,
S. Wong and T. Shope, Department of Pediatrics,
University of Florida Health Science Center,
Jacksonville, FL
7103
Implementing Medical School Curricular Innovations for a
Changing Health Care Environment: Challenges and
Opportunities
While integrated health care
systems where patient care is intensely managed are
becoming more common, young physicians are not being
taught how to provide high quality health care within
these systems. Therefore, the Health Resources and
Services Administration (HRSA) has funded a national
medical education program (1997–2002), Undergraduate
Medical Education for the 21st Century (UME-21). It is
administered by the American Association of Colleges of
Osteopathic Medicine. UME-21 funds 18 allopathic medical
schools to develop, implement, and evaluate innovative
educational strategies in the clinical years of medical
school. The goal of the curricular innovations is to
provide future physicians with the knowledge, skills,
values and attitudes necessary to provide high quality,
population-based, cost-effective medical care to their
patients within integrated health care systems. This
project aims to foster effective primary care teaching
in ambulatory and community-based settings.
The main goal of this workshop is to identify
challenges and opportunities that arise when medical
schools collaborate with integrated health systems
(including managed care organizations) to effect
curricular change in the clinical years of medical
school. Project evaluation data will be presented. At
the conclusion of the workshop, common barriers to
implementation and effective strategies to address those
barriers will be identified.
J. Pascoe, C. Christian, T. Kelly, L. Lane, K. Ling-McGeorge,
A. Olson, C. Olson, American Association of Colleges of
Osteopathic Medicine
7104
Introduction to Molecular Techniques in Pediatric
Research Training: Basic Principles of Gene Regulation
and Expression Analyses
Recent advances in cell and
molecular biology have revolutionized our understanding
of the molecular mechanisms underlying human disease.
Subspecialty training in pediatrics requires a
comprehensive understanding of the molecular
methodologies involved in the current diagnosis and
treatment of human disease as well as the future design
of therapeutic interventions. This workshop is designed
to provide the pediatric physician in training with an
overview of some basic molecular principles relevant to
understanding normal gene expression as well as aberrant
gene expression resulting in human disease. Workshop
modules will focus on participant identification of
several common laboratory methodologies for DNA cloning,
analyses of gene regulation and expression, and
histological tissue analyses. Upon completion of this
workshop, participants will be able to (a) describe
three fundamental steps of gene cloning and analysis,
(b) define two processes that regulate transcriptional
control of gene expression, (c) identify two methods for
analysis of gene expression in vitro and (d) identify
two histological techniques for the subcellular
localization of gene expression products in vivo.
Patricia L. Ramsay, Assistant Professor of
Pediatrics, Departments of Perinatal-Neonatal Medicine
and Cellular and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of
Medicine, Houston, TX
7105
Medical–Legal Collaboration: Advocacy in the Clinical
Setting
Lawyers have become an
essential part of the multidisciplinary healthcare team
that low-income communities rely on to protect the
health of their children. No longer is a doctor’s
letter enough. Poor families navigating the bureaucratic
barriers to government benefits such as food stamps or
subsidized housing need both a doctor and a lawyer by
their side. The goal of this workshop is to underline
the importance of making local social resource networks
more accessible to the patient population, while
simultaneously teaching health care providers how to do
so. The workshop will:
- Teach pediatricians and other health care
providers about the basics of legal advocacy by
providing them with the necessary tools and
resources to proactively address the social issues
that affect children’s health and wellness.
- Introduce pediatricians to Advocacy Code Cards, on
which are listed reference numbers of social service
agencies in Boston, a sample letter a doctor could
use to advocate for a patient, as well as general
advocacy tips.
- Emphasize the unique ability of medical–legal
collaborations located within pediatric clinics to
comprehensively care for children’s health.
Participants will learn methods to establish
liaisons between legal services and pediatric
offices. Case examples will be used to demonstrate
the usefulness of medical and collaboration from an
on-site legal service program to provide families
more holistic care.
B. Zuckerman, MD, M. Sandel, MD, E. Lawton, Esq.,
Eric Fleegler, MD, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA
7106
Quality Improvement Research—A How To Session
Quality improvement activities
are intended to close the gap between desired
evidence-based structures and processes of health care
and what is actually delivered. The Agency for
Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) continues to
encourage and support rigorous research so that quality
improvement efforts can themselves be evidence-based. In
this workshop, AHRQ awardees will explain how they
successfully applied for grants for quality improvement
research, and how they are conducting quality
improvement research in real world settings. The
grantees will discuss the theoretical and conceptual QI
frameworks that informed their approaches, the
interventions they designed and implemented, the tools
they used and developed, the practicalities of
collaborations with health systems and the barriers and
opportunities they encountered, including IRB issues.
The workshop will include substantial opportunities to
address participants' questions about individual
research projects and the overall QI theme.
D. M. Dougherty and M. Miller (co-chairs), Agency for
Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD; Charles
Irwin, MD, University of California-San Francisco;
MaryAnn Shafer, MD, University of California-San
Francisco, and two other awardees of AHRQ quality
improvement grants.
7107
The Management Skills You Need When Asked To Be the
"Medical Director"
Physicians are frequently
asked to shoulder administrative responsibilities in
addition to their more traditional clinical and teaching
duties. Balancing these new responsibilities can be a
challenge. Often time does not permit formal preparation
and training for these duties. This workshop provides a
"hands-on" practical overview of basic skills
needed for effective administrative leadership.
Using an interactive format, the workshop will begin
with a general approach to administration looking at
fiscal, personnel and quality improvement issues.
Participants will review standard financial reports such
as program profit/loss (P&Ls) and budget vs. actual
variance reports. Participants will discuss how to use
the information from these basic reports to manage a
budget or cost center. After developing familiarity with
fiscal issues, participants will discuss human resource
issues such as job descriptions and evaluations. Finally
the value of a quality improvement (QI) process will be
discussed.
At the conclusion of the workshop, participants will
have used real-life examples to gain experience that is
applicable to their own program and which will help them
review standard reports and manage a budget, recruit and
retain staff and participate in QI efforts.
A. P. Giardino, The Children's Hospital of
Philadelphia and Department of Pediatrics, University of
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
7108
Understanding Multivariate Regression: A Case-Based
Approach
Objective: To enable
clinicians to evaluate and interpret results of studies
which utilize multivariate regression analytic
techniques.
Introduction: Medical journals increasingly publish
observational studies which utilize complex statistical
analyses. Because treatment and prevention
recommendations may be founded on such studies,
clinicians need to understand the basic principles of
multivariate regression to appropriately evaluate their
results.
Course: This workshop will utilize a case-based
teaching approach to illustrate how multivariate
regression techniques work, when they are appropriate
and how they are interpreted. The participant will
understand how to evaluate and interpret studies which
use multivariate analytic models. Minimal computer and
math skills are necessary. We will begin by defining
confounding in an example study and how it is
distinguished from bias. Next we will define/calculate
crude odds ratios and confidence intervals using
datasets from studies of common pediatric diagnoses as
examples. We will then explain and demonstrate the
results from the same datasets using logistic regression
to adjust for confounding. This case-based approach will
be repeated using an example of simple linear and
multiple linear regression.
R. O. Wright, J. Grupp-Phelan, N. Kuppermann,
Divisions of Emergency Medicine, Brown University,
Providence RI, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH,
University of California-Davis, Davis, CA
8:45am-11:45am
Special Interest Groups
7109
Community-Based Physicians
The following is the agenda
for the Community-Based Physicians SIG which will be
meeting on Tuesday morning May 6 in the Baltimore
Convention Center:
- Presentation of the 1st Annual National Community
Teaching Award cosponsored by the AAP and APA to
recognize a community pediatrician who has dedicated
his/her career to the teaching of medical students
and residents in the office setting.
- A workshop entitled, "How To Overcome
Barriers to Community-Based Teaching—The Good, the
Bad and the Ugly," led by Dr. David Bromberg.
- A progress report from the AAP Resident Education
and Training SIG presented by Dr. Stan Fisch.
Any comments, suggestions or questions should be
addressed to Dr. Emanuel Doyne (513-636-8043 or doyne0@chmcc.org).
Chair: Emanuel Doyne, doyne0@chmcc.org
7110
Continuity Clinic
The Continuity Directors SIG
was organized by Jan Drutz 12 years ago and continues to
be a very active network for preceptors in resident
continuity settings. We’re very pleased that over the
years, the group has grown and completed projects that
none of us individually could have accomplished. The
annual SIG meeting, workshops, directories with clearing
house information, newsletters and research have
blossomed by the involvement of countless individuals
committed to enhancing resident education. Our group has
remained consistently enthusiastic and highly motivated
because of all the Continuity Directors’ and
preceptors’ attendance and active participation!
Our annual meeting is open to anyone interested in
continuity settings as sites for teaching and learning.
You do not need to be a continuity director—community
and hospital-based preceptors, residents, and
individuals interested in primary care and educational
research are welcome! Our meeting will provide an
opportunity to network and learn about current projects
and "hot topics" of interest. As usual, we
will focus on one interactive discussion about a current
topic of interest (selected from suggestions made at our
May 2001 meeting). Specific agenda information will be
available in the spring newsletter and on the APA
website. For more information, please contact one of the
SIG’s cochairs.
Cochairs: Marilyn Dumont-Driscoll, dumonmd@peds.ufl.edu,
and Diane Kittredge, diane.kittredge@hitchcock.org
7112
Pediatric Tobacco Issues
This inaugural meeting of the
"Cig SIG" will include an introductory session
during which members will briefly present their
interests and work in pediatric tobacco issues, a
presentation by members of the AAP's Center for Child
Health Research and presentation of a proposed APA
tobacco policy. A presentation by a potential funder is
being pursued. Other presentations will be considered.
if you are interested in suggesting a topic for
discussion or in making a presentation, please contact
either Dana Best, MD, MPH (dbbest@cnmc.org) or Deborah
Moss, MD, MPH (mossd@pitt.edu).
Cochairs: Dana Best, dbbest@cnmc.org,
and Deborah Moss, mossd@chplink.chp.edu
7113
Pediatrics for Family Practice
Iam looking forward to our May
meeting. Tentative plans are to discuss:
- a current survey of the pediatric training
component in Family Practice Programs
- best teaching approaches for pediatric training in
Family Practice Residency Programs
- ways to reduce barriers that might impede
pediatric training in Family Practice Residency
Programs
- efforts to revise and broaden the scope of the
Reilly Pediatric Training Manual for Family Practice
residents.
Please contact me if you have either been a past
participant in this SIG or a new member who would like
to contribute to this session. Iam very interested in
your feedback and your cooperative assistance with our
SIG program. In addition, let me know if there are any
other issues your would like to present. I look forward
to hearing from you. Contact: Dr. David Turkewitz,
Chairman Pediatrics, York Hospital, 1001 South George
Street, York, PA 17405, Phone: 717-851-3883, FAX:
717-851-3382, email: dturkewitz@wellspan.org
Chair: David Turkewitz, Dturkewitz@wellspan.org
7115
Serving the Underserved
We have invited local health
department experts to describe the innovative data
collection system used in Baltimore across several
different city departments. This should be a fascinating
discussion about the capacity of local government to
provide comprehensive population-based data that would
be important for health monitoring, tracking, etc. Next,
we have invited faculty from the Dyson Initiatives
funded sites to discuss their successes and failures in
getting residents involved in community based projects.
We will spend time during the SIG meeting to update
members about innovative approaches, lessons learned,
etc. that have come about as a result of the APA
National Pediatric Faculty Development Scholars Program.
Finally, we will present for the first time some of the
data from the curriculum development project.
Cochairs: Jeff Brown, jbrown@dhha.org,
and Ron Samuels, samuels@tch.harvard.edu
1:45pm-3:45pm
Hot Topic
7702
Disaster Preparedness: Beyond 9/11
Chairs: Tina L. Cheng,
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore,
MD; Danelle Laraque, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New
York, NY; and Benard Dreyer, New York, NY
The impact of 9/11 and the
public health aftermath have affected us personally and
professionally. This session will address what the child
health professional needs to know regarding disaster
planning and preparedness. Speakers will review and
provide updates on national and regional systems for
emergency management and how those systems interact with
local public health agencies, the pediatrician's role in
the community's preparedness including what the school
system, the pediatric office and the patient should be
doing to prepare and respond, recognition and management
of chemical and biologic agents of terrorism, and the
psychological reactions to disaster and stress.
Disaster Planning and Preparedness for Child Health
Professionals
George L. Foltin, New York University School of
Medicine and Bellevue Hospital Center, New York, NY
Biologic Agents of Terrorism
Anne Fine, New York City Department of Health, New
York, NY
Chemical Agents of Terrorism
Fred Henretig, University of Pennsylvania School of
Medicine and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia,
Philadelphia, PA
Helping Children Cope with Terrorism and Disasters
David J. Schonfeld, Yale University School of
Medicine, New Haven, CT
Discussion
|